La modalité déontique dans le discours juridique : analyse pragma- énonciative des arrêts de la Cour de cassation française
The deontic modality in legal discourse: pragma-enunciative analysis of the judgments of the French Court of Cassation
Keywords:
Deontic modality, legal discourse, pragma-enunciation, Court of Cassation, discourse analysisAbstract
This research focuses on the manifestations of deontic modality in legal discourse focusing on a body of judgments rendered by “the French Court of Cassation between 2018 and 2023”. By mobilizing the theoretical contributions of pragma-enunciation (Kerbrat-Orecchioni, 2021) and modal semantics (Gosselin, 2020), we will analyze the discursive strategies deployed by magistrates to express “obligation”, “permission” and " the ban ". Our approach, anchored in discourse analysis (Maingueneau, 2022), will
endeavor to detect the nuances between “explicit deontic modality” and “implicit”, while examining their interaction with the other modal dimensions of judicial discourse. In doing so, we aim to shed light on the linguistic mechanisms through which the construction of legal authority and normativity takes place in these highly codified texts (Cornu, 2019).
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors of articles published in THE ALGERIAN JOURNAL OF LETTERS (REVUE ALGERIENNE DES LETTRES) retain the copyright of their articles and are free to reproduce and disseminate their work.
All open-access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.